Publikujeme výstupy na facebooku i na Youtube kanále @institutceskelevice2409
Publikujeme texty a dokumenty převážně zaměřené na levicovou problematiku
Publikujeme texty a dokumenty převážně zaměřené na levicovou problematiku
Pořádáme a podporujeme konání rozmanitých kulturních a vzdělávacích akcí
V našem blogu pravidelně informujeme o novinkách z Institutu české levice jako jsou naše akce, nové publikace a další užitečné informace.
Diskuse Institutu české levice, kterou uvedli Mgr. Michal Ševčík a Mgr. Pavel Tuček. Probíhala 29. 4. 2026 od 15:30 v místnosti 128, II. patro, Politických vězňů 9, Praha.
Video je na https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DP0fOvi7hq8
After the breakdown of talks in Pakistan, the ceasefire between the US and Iran is more fragile than ever, and now seems likely to give way to a new phase of the war. The ceasefire and talks have failed to end Israel’s devastating attacks on Lebanon or to negotiate international access to the Strait of Hormuz, now under Iran’s control.
Více: counterpunch.org
An Interview with Jeffrey D. Sachs by Tucker Carlson On the war in Iran, the US—Israel alliance, and the choice of an off-ramp
Edited from the taped interview here: https://www.youtube.com/live/sFow6dOMfgQ
Tucker Carlson: Jeff, thanks a lot for doing this.
Jeffrey Sachs: Great to be with you.
Tucker Carlson: Where does it go from here? The war in Iran.
Jeffrey Sachs: We’re at a decisive moment, and there’s an off-ramp we should take. We should avoid a return to outright bombing—a very real possibility. The other possibility is uncontrolled escalation into full-blown war that becomes regional and could become a world war. We’re not in a stable situation where we can choose at our leisure. The world economy is reeling, because, as everybody has learned in their geography in the last few weeks, the Strait of Hormuz is closed1. As long as it’s closed, a worldwide economic crisis is building. We can’t say, well, we’ll decide in another month, we’ll see how things go, we’ll negotiate. Right now, there is a serious global economic crisis, because a narrow stretch of water through which an enormous strategic flow of resources passes—oil and gas, but also fertilizers, petrochemicals, and commodities like aluminum—is closed. Simply opening it would be fine. That’s basically what the off-ramp would allow. It would not solve any of the underlying issues, nor any of the stated objectives of the United States, much less Israel. I don’t believe those objectives were valid, so they shouldn’t be the basis for whether to take that exit ramp. But there’s a way out that avoids escalation to something quite different.
